|
INTERFERENCE.COM U2 Fans, 'Zine, and More |
|
|
#61 |
|
Blue Crack Addict
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Obscured By Clouds...
Posts: 19,855
Local Time: 09:08 AM
|
What a game this is. Keep going Rafa!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Blue Crack Addict
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Obscured By Clouds...
Posts: 19,855
Local Time: 09:08 AM
|
Lara - glad to see you're favouring the tennis over BB like me!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Blue Crack Addict
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Obscured By Clouds...
Posts: 19,855
Local Time: 09:08 AM
|
YES! Superb effort from Nadal!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: manchester
Posts: 5,748
Local Time: 09:08 AM
|
Blah
![]() Great game of tennis though ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Blue Crack Addict
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Obscured By Clouds...
Posts: 19,855
Local Time: 09:08 AM
|
Yep. Best in years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
ONE
love, blood, life Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: not philadelphia
Posts: 12,045
Local Time: 05:08 AM
|
I'm glad I managed to turn it on in time for the final tiebreak game. That's as good as it gets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
►Smiley Queen◄
Premium Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: blue craic
Posts: 37,679
Local Time: 01:08 AM
|
I started watching at the 4th set. What a game!!!
![]() Congrats Nadal!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
ONE
love, blood, life Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Slovenija
Posts: 14,905
Local Time: 10:08 AM
|
What a game, well played both of them.
And now this may be a real rivarly coming. Go Nadal ! |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
|
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: manchester
Posts: 5,748
Local Time: 09:08 AM
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Size matters not
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kettering, Ohio
Posts: 7,321
Local Time: 04:08 AM
|
I am SO happy that Nadal won.
I really did not want Federer to break Borg's record for number of Wimbledon's in a row. Now in the history books, Borg and Federer will be next to each other, instead of Federer being above. It's not likely Federer will ever the chance to win a sixth Wimbledon in a row again. I actually hope Federer loses at the U.S. Open, so he can finally have a full winless year in terms of majors. I also hope he never breaks Sampras's record...but he probably will. Congrats Nadal! |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
ONE
love, blood, life Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: "oh my god it’s Larry mulling jar"
Posts: 12,867
Local Time: 05:38 AM
|
Quote:
Anyway, that was easily one of the best tennis matches I've ever seen. Maybe even THE best. Roger wasn't playing all that well in the first two sets, but once he picked up his game again, the quality of the match simply skyrocketed. The shots that he and Nadal were capable of coming up with - even after four hours in the fifth set - were incredible. It was so close. Devastating for Roger and his fans, of course...heh, I'm not afraid to admit that I felt like bawling when I saw him lifting up that pissy little tray instead of the trophy. So gracious in defeat... Even ol' Johnny Mac sounded a bit choked up when he was interviewing him inside the building. You've got to hand it to the Nadal though. He was just a little bit better than Federer today. Congratulations to Rafa. He finally did it! I'm happy for him, even though I wanted Federer to get his sixth in a row. You could see how much it meant to him to be able to win it. Will he be able to do it again? Next year can't come soon enough...God, I love Wimbledon. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 | |
|
Forza Azzurri!!
Premium Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Lune De L'Espace
Posts: 4,967
Local Time: 04:08 AM
|
Quote:
What people don't realize is that one day they'll be able to tell their kids and grandkids that they saw the great Federer in his prime, when he won five consecutive Wimbledon's. So they should appreciate athlete's exploits.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,328
Local Time: 03:08 AM
|
What a great match that was!
![]() I loved Nadal climbing all-over the broadcast booth and the clock deck and everything. Really fucking cool. I have to admit to rooting for Fed, though. I've watched Fed ruin a number of Roddick's bids for Grand Slam titles so I wanted to see him ruin Nadal's chance here, too. Oh well. They both deserved it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 | |
|
Size matters not
Premium Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kettering, Ohio
Posts: 7,321
Local Time: 04:08 AM
|
Quote:
Agassi alone makes Sampras's competition stiffer than Federer's ever has been, imo. And Borg? He had McEnroe and Connors to go up against. Roddick and Hewitt have consistently folded like a house of cards to Federer. I honestly think the second half of Federer's career is going to be considerably tougher than the first, because he's going to have Nadal and Djokovic(He beat Federer once and came very close to doing so in last year's U.S. Open final) to deal with, and he'll be getting older(in tennis terms - he's about to be 27, and early 30s is the typical expiration date for tennis players). Another thing: Federer is as arrogant as any great champion of any sport should be, he's just good at hiding it and pretending to be humble and modest. Whereas a guy like Sampras was loud and made little to no effort to hide his ego, Federer wears his ego on a small, subtle grin on his face when he's winning, rather than shouting it out to the world the way Sampras did. It kills me that people actually believe that he's this humble, modest guy with no ego at all. How could you not have a huge ego when you're three majors away from an all-time record? You can't. And a third thing: If Federer has a winless year, he will at long last appear to be somewhat human. Perhaps other players will start believing they can beat Federer instead of him being this untouchable god. Nadal denying him a record sixth straight Wimbledon is the first step in that, imo. Federer has made tennis boring, imo. I am not denying that he's a great player. But I would rather have watched Nadal, Roddick, Hewitt, Blake, Nalbandian, etc fight it out and create some parity over these last five years than for Federer to just destroy everybody. I mean even when Borg was dominating there was some parity. Borg won 12, but Connors won 8, Lendl won 8, McEnroe won 7. There were other legitimately great players giving him competition. That is why I wanted so badly for Nadal to win this, and so badly for either him or Djokovic to win the U.S. Open this year, so that there can be some legitimately great players to give Federer competition. Sadly, I have all but given up on Roddick being one of those guys. I hunger for an era like the second half of the 80s and first couple years of the 90s where there was no dominant force(Borg had retired and Sampras didn't start truly dominating until 93 or so). You had Lendl, Becker, Wilander, Edberg, etc all winning. Or like the late 90s and early 00s, when Sampras was fading, you had Agassi, Patrick Rafter, Safin, Hewitt, etc all vying. I don't hate Federer. I just hate the monotony of tennis during his reign. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
New Yorker
Premium Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,859
Local Time: 04:08 AM
|
Definitely the best final in recent memory. Nadal was humble in his victory, and both players had some superhuman shots there.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| tennis, wimbledon |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|