INTERFERENCE.COM
U2 Fans, 'Zine, and More
 

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Your Blue Room > Peeling off those Dollar Bills




Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2008, 09:31 PM   #16
U2FanPeter
Refugee
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 2,453
Local Time: 06:06 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by doctorwho
As a follow-up, "Rattle & Hum" opened in 1,391 theaters domestically - which was HUGE for that time (1988). In other words, it saturated the market. Its final domestic gross was $8,600,823 in 1988 dollars, which converts to approximately $14.5M in 2008 dollars. If U2-3D can come even close to that amount, playing in less than half the theaters, I would consider this a huge success.
I imagine that they've made more from the RH tv syndication and VHS/DVD/HiDef release than on sheer Box Office Mojo.


U2FanPeter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 08:17 PM   #17
cjboog
War Child
 
cjboog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 631
Local Time: 10:06 AM
Sorry I've been a way for a while. Here we go!!

4/25-27
Weekend Total: $100,960 (+92% from last week)
# of Theatres: 22 (+3 from last week)
Per Theatre Average: $4,589 (up from $2,771 last week)
Total US Box Office: $7,636,487


cjboog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2008, 09:01 PM   #18
bonocomet
Blue Crack Supplier
Premium Gold Member
 
bonocomet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: grumpytown :(
Posts: 34,194
Local Time: 10:06 AM
Images: 3
I don't know what's considered good or bad when looking at these numbers. Are these good? Is this considered a succesful film after this amount of time now then? Thanks for the updates!


__________________
bonocomet is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2008, 06:40 PM   #19
LemonMelon
Pimp Trick Gangsta Click
Premium Gold Member
 
LemonMelon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Outer space, and I'm not coming down until I've taken a slice of the SPACE MOON.
Posts: 26,585
Local Time: 01:06 PM
Any final numbers for this thing? I like that it was actually increasing in per theatre average as of a month ago.


__________________

"We have hearsay and conjecture. Those are 'kinds' of evidence..."
LemonMelon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2008, 09:50 PM   #20
solar
The Fly
 
solar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: CROATIA
Posts: 287
Local Time: 07:06 PM
Domestic: $8,121,948 61.8%
+ Foreign: $5,020,096 38.2%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

= Worldwide: $13,142,044



source: boxofficemojo.com


solar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 07:48 PM   #21
BigMacPhisto
New Yorker
 
BigMacPhisto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 2,559
Local Time: 10:06 AM
U2 3D Finishes Ninth In Per Theater Average This Past Weekend

Looks like it's still a money maker for any theater showing it. Those are very impressive numbers. I think the real problem was oversaturation. It became too easy to see U2 3D in a lot of the major cities which then diluted the box office performance per theater, causing a lot of them to drop it (when the smart ones should have stuck with the film and seen the receipts go up as soon as the competing theaters stopped carrying it).

It made $52,690 this past weekend, improving 20.4% despite the premiere of The Dark Knight crippling everything.

Domestic Gross: $8,880,139 (53.6%)
Foreign Gross: $7,691,236 (46.4%)
Worldwide Total: $16,571,375

We still have absolutely no idea how much this release cost to produce and promote. There's usually a 50/50 cut between distributors and theater chains, so if it was under $8 million, it has been profitable. If $5 million is the estimate, it's made about $3 million worldwide which is impressive for a concert picture.


BigMacPhisto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 11:31 PM   #22
bonocomet
Blue Crack Supplier
Premium Gold Member
 
bonocomet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: grumpytown :(
Posts: 34,194
Local Time: 10:06 AM
Images: 3
Thanks for the update! I sure wish it would have stayed in San Diego longer. It was gone way too quickly.


__________________
bonocomet is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 08:44 AM   #23
cm
The Fly
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Andover, MN
Posts: 134
Local Time: 12:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigMacPhisto View Post
U2 3D Finishes Ninth In Per Theater Average This Past Weekend

We still have absolutely no idea how much this release cost to produce and promote. There's usually a 50/50 cut between distributors and theater chains, so if it was under $8 million, it has been profitable. If $5 million is the estimate, it's made about $3 million worldwide which is impressive for a concert picture.

I read somewhere that the budget was $15 million so I believe this film has a long way to go before it becomes profitable. If you simply consider the equipment used for filming and shooting at multiple locations and the post processing, it is easy to see them approaching that figure. I believe they will be closely watching home sales of the Hannah Montana 3D movie to determine viability of a similar U2 release.


cm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 11:32 PM   #24
rihannsu
Refugee
 
rihannsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 1,015
Local Time: 01:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cm View Post
I read somewhere that the budget was $15 million so I believe this film has a long way to go before it becomes profitable. If you simply consider the equipment used for filming and shooting at multiple locations and the post processing, it is easy to see them approaching that figure. I believe they will be closely watching home sales of the Hannah Montana 3D movie to determine viability of a similar U2 release.
Actually they said upfront that they didn't necessarily expect a profit. They got into it for the chance to work with new technology and provide a realistic way for people who can't afford to see U2 live to get at least a close approximation of a show. Also Bono is excited about the fact that this will show in countries they haven't been able to play in yet. They didn't have a distribution deal until after the Cannes festival. They were still in post production at that point and only had 55 minutes of film to show there so getting the distribution deal sealed probably allowed them more leeway to get the rest done. I think U2 actually partnered with 3ality so I'm not sure who was putting up what money or how much each contributed but Bono has definitely said they didn't worry about whether it would make a profit or not.

As for the home release they said they would want to wait until home viewing of 3D was of decent quality without being too exorbitantly priced but they always felt they would get there eventually. I don't think they are going to care about how Hannah Montana sells but rather would care more about being sure that people who buy it can expect a decent experience in watching it. They did say they would definitely not do a 2D release which makes sense because they already have the Chicago Vertigo DVD and the partial Milan show so no need to have this in 2D.

Dana


rihannsu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2008, 07:16 AM   #25
phommel
War Child
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Roermond, Netherlands
Posts: 553
Local Time: 07:06 PM
hmm what will be the next step? Receiving a pair of 3D glasses before entering the arena ? then there will be no bad seats anymore...bono will come close in your face


phommel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2008, 10:29 PM   #26
rihannsu
Refugee
 
rihannsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 1,015
Local Time: 01:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by phommel View Post
hmm what will be the next step? Receiving a pair of 3D glasses before entering the arena ? then there will be no bad seats anymore...bono will come close in your face

There are screens being worked on that would allow viewing of 3D without glasses. Now that would be nice for a tour.

Dana


rihannsu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2008, 11:32 PM   #27
Val
New Yorker
Premium Gold Member
 
Val's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 3,042
Local Time: 01:06 PM
I just visited my sister in DC where I saw U2 3D at the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History Imax theater. I was so happy to see it was still playing there, and wowed when I actual got to see it on an Imax screen.

It is still playing in a few cities in the states, so check out the U23D website if you haven't seen it.


Val is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2008, 02:07 AM   #28
DoctorMacPhisto
Acrobat
 
DoctorMacPhisto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 434
Local Time: 01:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigMacPhisto View Post
U2 3D Finishes Ninth In Per Theater Average This Past Weekend

Looks like it's still a money maker for any theater showing it. Those are very impressive numbers. I think the real problem was oversaturation. It became too easy to see U2 3D in a lot of the major cities which then diluted the box office performance per theater, causing a lot of them to drop it (when the smart ones should have stuck with the film and seen the receipts go up as soon as the competing theaters stopped carrying it).

It made $52,690 this past weekend, improving 20.4% despite the premiere of The Dark Knight crippling everything.

Domestic Gross: $8,880,139 (53.6%)
Foreign Gross: $7,691,236 (46.4%)
Worldwide Total: $16,571,375

We still have absolutely no idea how much this release cost to produce and promote. There's usually a 50/50 cut between distributors and theater chains, so if it was under $8 million, it has been profitable. If $5 million is the estimate, it's made about $3 million worldwide which is impressive for a concert picture.
Wow, that's impressive.

It was so good.


DoctorMacPhisto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 07:04 PM   #29
BigMacPhisto
New Yorker
 
BigMacPhisto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 2,559
Local Time: 10:06 AM
This weekend, it slid 12.5% from the previous weekend to earn $25,244. It's per screen average of $5,048 was enough for it to rank seventh in that category, earning more than Tropic Thunder & Death Race although slightly less than The House Bunny. Pretty good for a now-ancient release to be outdrawing all but one wide release.

Domestic Total: $9,365,105
Worldwide Total: $7,702,66

Overall Total: $17,067,771

The film still has yet to crack a lot of foreign markets and will surely be more successful per-theater elsewhere than the US because the band has less fans here per capita than most places and has a lot of people that vehemently hate the group. In other words, this thing could end up making around $30M worldwide at most which is absolutely phenomenal. Cheers to the band, the production company & distributor for taking chances with new technology and having it succeed commercially moreso than ever expected.


BigMacPhisto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 08:00 PM   #30
bonocomet
Blue Crack Supplier
Premium Gold Member
 
bonocomet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: grumpytown :(
Posts: 34,194
Local Time: 10:06 AM
Images: 3
Thanks so much for these updates. Very fun to watch


__________________
bonocomet is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
u23d

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com