INTERFERENCE.COM
U2 Fans, 'Zine, and More
 

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Lemonade Stand > Zoo Station




Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-03-2008, 09:53 PM   #46
SpiritRover
Babyface
 
SpiritRover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Gusev Crater
Posts: 19
Local Time: 01:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FitzChivalry View Post
Wall-E

Liked it a lot. Probably not my favorite PIXAR, but much, much better than "Cars", IMO. (I haven't seen "Ratatouille" yet.) My sister thought it was slow in parts. I don't think it was slow, but it definitely lost some of it's zest once the story shifted to solely in space.

But the entire time on Earth I friggin' LOVED! If you've ever had a crush one someone, (and puh-lease! who hasn't!) it's just so relateable.

Cute. Very, very cute. And an amazing job by PIXAR.

Definitely, highly recommend.
I loved this film. Wall-E seemed like a long-lost relative.


SpiritRover is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 11:21 PM   #47
LemonMacPhisto
Pepe Silvia
Premium Gold Member
 
LemonMacPhisto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Five Points
Posts: 27,573
Local Time: 07:26 AM
I can't say I was disappointed about Hancock because I had such low expectations for it. Lady Friend and I would have rather seen Wall*E, but our other friends saw it the day before. The beginning was promising enough, and I was with it up until the bank robbery sequence. After that, it became a terrible example of the genre it tried to satirize. The Charlize Theron twist is so easy to call and unnecessary to the story, I think. It leaves the entire third act feeling incredibly off-kilter. Apparently the script's been shopped around Hollywood for years, and while it's the right time for a film like this, what could've been a brilliant spin on the newly huge superhero genre was watered down and just merely a bunch of good ideas in an otherwise lame movie. In the end, you just can't connect with any of the major characters, with the exception of Jason Bateman's character, because of the forced storyline. That being said, it wasn't a bad movie - just what could've been a great movie reduced to OK Summer filler, even if box office giant Will Smith is in this.

**1/2


__________________
http://u2.interference.com/signaturepics/sigpic32869_10.gif
LemonMacPhisto is offline  
Old 07-04-2008, 10:47 PM   #48
Lancemc
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
Premium Gold Member
 
Lancemc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In low orbit over the seas of Pandora
Posts: 9,363
Local Time: 07:26 AM
Wall-E - 9.0

I'm going to have a lot easier a time reflecting on this film by only picking out what I didn't like about it. Besides the things I mention below, I was absolutely enamored with it. I think it's the clear pick for best Pixar endeavor to date, and will likely remain one of my favorite animated features for a long time. It was brilliantly crafted, insanely heartwarming and cute, had my laughing in the theater the most since Superbad, and showcased absolutely SPECTACULAR sound design. Now onto my issues, which I shall enumerate like a tool.

3. As the film progressed, it became increasingly predictable in terms of plot. While it began with a great sense of wonder and discovery, the necessity of narrative called for a turn towards a distinct conclusion which unfortunately could have been handled with a bit more imagination.

2. This is a tricky one, and it's probably too early decide exactly how I feel about it, but it probably warrants mention regardless, just keep in mind I'm still of two minds on this particular issue. Fat people. Without getting into specifics, I completely understand the decision to portray the humans in this film as the filmmakers chose, and even commend them on making a truly ballsy decision like that in a children's film. Kudos Pixar, you've got balls. On the other hand, I have some problems with said design. For one thing, it's almost unbearably lacking in anything remotely resembling subtlety. Now, like I said, it's blatant criticism it part of what makes it such a bold move, but I can't help but imagine the film being more effective with a more subtle and (again) imaginative means of expressing their criticisms on Western consumerism. And for another thing, some moments of such criticism were almost so blunt and scathing that I myself had to cringe. I'm not exactly the best image of fitness and hard work, but I can't even imagine the reactions of the more slobbish and lazy viewers on my theater tonight. Yeesh.

1. Finally, my biggest fault with Wall-E is closely tied into the other two issues. At some point in the film, the focus shifts from an entirely robot perspective to an increasingly wider perspective including the human characters. As such, there was increasingly less Wall-E and EVE in my Wall-E, and while the stuff with the Captain and passengers was still enjoyable, it was considerably less engaging than following out two main characters. If the film were design with a more narrow focus on Wall-E and EVE, while still achieving its broader thematic goals and epic scope, it could have been an unrivaled masterpiece instead of a merely exceptional work of filmmaking.

So ultimately, I love Wall-E, but it's far from perfect. The combined effect of my problems with it result in a general steady decrease in enjoyment through out the duration of the flick. It starts off on an absolute astonishing high note, and merely settles down to a simply satisfactory one, with a few peaks and valleys in between. However, despite these flaws, this is a must-see feature, and serves as a real creative landmark for Pixar and indeed Western animation as a whole.


Lancemc is offline  
Old 07-04-2008, 11:34 PM   #49
FitzChivalry
New Yorker
Premium Gold Member
 
FitzChivalry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: At the bottom of the ocean, in the deepest sea
Posts: 2,965
Local Time: 04:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lancemc View Post
Wall-E - 9.0

1. Finally, my biggest fault with Wall-E is closely tied into the other two issues. At some point in the film, the focus shifts from an entirely robot perspective to an increasingly wider perspective including the human characters. As such, there was increasingly less Wall-E and EVE in my Wall-E, and while the stuff with the Captain and passengers was still enjoyable, it was considerably less engaging than following out two main characters.

The combined effect of my problems with it result in a general steady decrease in enjoyment through out the duration of the flick. It starts off on an absolute astonishing high note, and merely settles down to a simply satisfactory one, with a few peaks and valleys in between.
I agree with your above comments and analysis.

My minute gripe with the film ties in to your #1 criticism. In addition to your observation that the film switches from a more narrow, personal POV to a wider, all encompassing POV -- my gripe is -- the supporting characters are not memorable enough to support the weight of such a shift.

This is one of the few Disney animated films I've seen where almost none of the supporting character or sidekicks were memorable or left any distinctive-lasting flavor with me. The cockroach and the robot that cleans up dirty-wheel messes . . . those are about the only two side-characters that I enjoyed, or would care to see more of. Even the Captain, though amiable and innocuous, I found disposable.

But I agree with you that, despite a few flaws, it was a great, great movie. One that I hope to see again.


FitzChivalry is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 09:57 AM   #50
beegee
Shadow Boxer
Premium Gold Member
 
beegee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: southern nevada
Posts: 8,979
Local Time: 04:26 AM
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by corianderstem View Post
Be Kind, Rewind

Did anyone see this?
I get so tired of Jack Black's same old act.

I tried to watch it yesterday but couldn't make it through the entire thing.

I got as far as Sigourney Weaver showing up in the video store.


beegee is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 12:26 PM   #51
corianderstem
The Rural Juror
Premium Gold Member
 
corianderstem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In the land of hope and dreams.
Posts: 17,271
Local Time: 04:26 AM
Persepolis

Wow, did I love this movie. It was brilliant. I loved the animation and the look of the film.

It was nominated for best animated picture this past year, right? I'm so tired of Disney and Pixar winning the animated awards. I understand some might have actually thought French Rats In Kitchens was the better movie, but I think it's time for them to realize that animation does not have to equal happy fun critters all the time.


__________________
A heart that hurts is a heart that works.
corianderstem is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 12:30 PM   #52
Lancemc
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
Premium Gold Member
 
Lancemc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In low orbit over the seas of Pandora
Posts: 9,363
Local Time: 07:26 AM
Persepolis is really high on my want-to-see list. Good to hear more good things.


Lancemc is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 02:44 PM   #53
LemonMacPhisto
Pepe Silvia
Premium Gold Member
 
LemonMacPhisto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Five Points
Posts: 27,573
Local Time: 07:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by corianderstem View Post
Persepolis

Wow, did I love this movie. It was brilliant. I loved the animation and the look of the film.

It was nominated for best animated picture this past year, right? I'm so tired of Disney and Pixar winning the animated awards. I understand some might have actually thought French Rats In Kitchens was the better movie, but I think it's time for them to realize that animation does not have to equal happy fun critters all the time.
Here are the stats on Animated Film Oscars since its creation in 2001. I was kind of surprised at the results:

* 2001 (74th) Shrek - DreamWorks SKG - Aron Warner

o Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius - Paramount Pictures - Steve Oedekerk, John A. Davis
o Monsters, Inc. - Walt Disney Pictures & Pixar Animation Studios - Pete Docter, John Lasseter

* 2002 (75th) Spirited Away - Toho (Japan) / Walt Disney Pictures (USA) - Hayao Miyazaki

o Ice Age - 20th Century Fox - Chris Wedge
o Lilo & Stitch - Walt Disney Pictures - Chris Sanders
o Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron - DreamWorks SKG - Jeffrey Katzenberg, Mireille Soria
o Treasure Planet - Walt Disney Pictures - Ron Clements

* 2003 (76th) Finding Nemo Walt Disney Pictures & Pixar Animation Studios - Andrew Stanton
o Brother Bear - Walt Disney Picture - Aaron Blaise, Robert Walker
o The Triplets of Belleville - Diaphana Films (France) / Sony Pictures Classics (USA) - Sylvain Chomet

* 2004 (77th) The Incredibles - Walt Disney Pictures & Pixar Animation Studios - Brad Bird
o Shark Tale - DreamWorks SKG - Bill Damaschke
o Shrek 2 - DreamWorks SKG - Andrew Adamson

* 2005 (78th) Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit - DreamWorks SKG & Aardman Animations - Nick Park, Steve Box
o Howl's Moving Castle - Toho (Japan) / Walt Disney Pictures (USA) - Hayao Miyazaki
o Corpse Bride - Warner Bros. - Mike Johnson, Tim Burton

* 2006 (79th) Happy Feet - Warner Bros. (USA) / Village Roadshow Pictures (Australia) - George Miller
o Cars - Walt Disney Pictures & Pixar Animation Studios - John Lasseter
o Monster House - Columbia Pictures - Gil Kenan

* 2007 (80th) Ratatouille - Walt Disney Pictures & Pixar Animation Studios - Brad Bird
o Persepolis - Sony Pictures Classics - Marjane Satrapi, Vincent Paronnaud
o Surf's Up - Columbia Pictures - Lydia Bottegoni, Chris Buck

3 Disney/Pixar, 2 Dreamworks, 1 Foreign, and a partridge in a pear tree.


__________________
http://u2.interference.com/signaturepics/sigpic32869_10.gif
LemonMacPhisto is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 02:54 PM   #54
corianderstem
The Rural Juror
Premium Gold Member
 
corianderstem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In the land of hope and dreams.
Posts: 17,271
Local Time: 04:26 AM
Thanks - I guess it hasn't been as Disney-centric as I had thought. I think I've just had my fill of Disney/Pixar.

How the hell did Surf's Up get nominated? Were there no other animated movies to choose from?


__________________
A heart that hurts is a heart that works.
corianderstem is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 02:57 PM   #55
Irvine511
Hugs not Drugs
Premium Gold Member
 
Irvine511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 16,599
Local Time: 07:26 AM
Wall*E was amazing. i almost cried because it was so good.


__________________

THE WORLD ONLY SPINS FORWARD
Irvine511 is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 03:20 PM   #56
LemonMacPhisto
Pepe Silvia
Premium Gold Member
 
LemonMacPhisto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Five Points
Posts: 27,573
Local Time: 07:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by corianderstem View Post
Thanks - I guess it hasn't been as Disney-centric as I had thought. I think I've just had my fill of Disney/Pixar.

How the hell did Surf's Up get nominated? Were there no other animated movies to choose from?
Same here... Finding Nemo winning anything really pisses me off, then again, I'm one of the few people who's never really liked that movie.

The Simpsons Movie came out that year, too, wonder why it didn't get a nom either.

The Oscar Nomination process bothers the hell out of me. Most of it is studio push+$$$+timing over actual quality, otherwise something as awesome as Zodiac would've gotten some notice last year.


__________________
http://u2.interference.com/signaturepics/sigpic32869_10.gif
LemonMacPhisto is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 03:20 PM   #57
Lancemc
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
Premium Gold Member
 
Lancemc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In low orbit over the seas of Pandora
Posts: 9,363
Local Time: 07:26 AM
And how the hell did Happy Feet win an Oscar? Fuck that movie.


Lancemc is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 03:23 PM   #58
lazarus
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
lazarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 6,740
Local Time: 04:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by corianderstem View Post
I'm so tired of Disney and Pixar winning the animated awards. I understand some might have actually thought French Rats In Kitchens was the better movie, but I think it's time for them to realize that animation does not have to equal happy fun critters all the time.
Well said, and I like the more abstract method used in Persepolis.

Of course, if I had my way, the Japanese would be winning this every year. Because when Miyazaki doesn't have a film in contention, Satoshi Kon does. As much as I loved Persepolis, Paprika totally blew me away, and pushes the boundaries of the medium more than anything I've seen in a long time.


lazarus is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 03:31 PM   #59
LemonMacPhisto
Pepe Silvia
Premium Gold Member
 
LemonMacPhisto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Five Points
Posts: 27,573
Local Time: 07:26 AM
After seeing L.A. Confidential yesterday, I think I've come to the conclusion that 1997 had some of the most kickass films of the decade - Confidential, Boogie Nights, Jackie Brown, Good Will Hunting, and Waiting for Guffman... yet Titanic won all of the awards. That's as solid of a Top 5 until you get to the mindfuck that was 1999.

I can barely put into words how much I loved L.A. Confidential... it's got me really psyched to start watching some film noirs.

On the other hand, Blue Velvet left me pretty underwhelmed. It's probably just not right for me. Like with Dune, Lynch's visual style kept me interested, but apart from Dennis Hopper, the "In Dreams" sequence, and first "voyeur" scene, I could not say I liked it all that much.


__________________
http://u2.interference.com/signaturepics/sigpic32869_10.gif
LemonMacPhisto is offline  
Old 07-05-2008, 03:36 PM   #60
lazarus
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
lazarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 6,740
Local Time: 04:26 AM
Don't forget The Sweet Hereafter. That is one hell of a film, and actually managed to score directing and screenplay noms.

Also Robert Duvall's The Apostle, Donnie Brasco, Wag the Dog, Deconstructing Harry, Kundun, and Gattaca.

And of course you have lesser but entertaining fare from good directors like Starship Troopers, The Fifth Element and Face/Off.


lazarus is offline  
Closed Thread

Tags
film reviews

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com